#5k monitor for mac pro 2013 1080p#
#5k monitor for mac pro 2013 full#

#5k monitor for mac pro 2013 full#

AppleвЂ™s вЂњBest for DisplayвЂќ option, which gives you the displayвЂ™s full 3840 x 2160 resolution, still made UI elements a bit too tiny for my liking, so I opted for the next down scaling preset that looks like 3008 x 1692 but keeps everything on the display incredibly sharp and easy to read. That corrected a lot of the initial complaints about 4K displays with Macs and made the higher resolution displays usable.

OS X 10.9.3 introduced scaling options for 4K displays not unlike those available for AppleвЂ™s own Retina displays. The monitor includes 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 mini-DisplayPort, 4 USB 3.0 and a 6-in-1 media card reader, and the stand offers adjustable height, swivel and tilting. That works with MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013), Mac Pro (Late 2013), and iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014). OS X supports the Dell UP3214Q at 60Hz after manually enabling DisplayPort 1.2 (the same canвЂ™t be said for all supported 4K displays) and thatвЂ™s what I opted for using a mini DisplayPort 1.2 cable into the Thunderbolt port on my Mac Pro and the mini DisplayPort on the monitor.

#5k monitor for mac pro 2013 1080p#

This is a bigger problem for those coming from a Retina MacBook to a new Mac Pro like myself: 1080p simply doesnвЂ™t cut it once youвЂ™ve experienced super crisp text on a Retina display making 4K a necessity for many. One thing is true for all of these 4K displays: Once you go 4K, thereвЂ™s no going back. Using this Dell 4K monitor was the first time an external display has been able to live up to the experience of my Retina MacBook Pro, which I had been using since its launch in 2011 before acquiring a new Mac Pro this year. Color accuracy, refresh rate, a high-quality IGZO panel, and a solid physical design, most of the other displays I tried didnвЂ™t impress in at least one or more of these categories, but the Dell stood strong. In my tests, the Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q offered the fewest compromises with most shortcomings being OS X related and often much more pronounced in other 4K displays, especially anything in what would be considered an affordable price point for most. I donвЂ™t have much bad to say about AppleвЂ™s display- itвЂ™s tried and tested and a solid choice- but at $999 almost three years later, IвЂ™m inclined to recommend these new 4K displays over AppleвЂ™s.Д«EST OVERALL вЂ“ DELL 31.5вЂќ UltraSharp UP3214Q вЂ“ $1,699 | Despite my tests being done mostly on a new, stock Mac Pro, these picks stand for Thunderbolt-equipped MacBook users as well.ДЄpple last made silent minor tweaks to the Thunderbolt display in July 2012, but otherwise it has remained the same since its introduction over 3 years ago. IвЂ™ve been testing Mac Pro compatible displays from Dell, Sharp, Samsung, LG, and others that are officially supported by Apple, and put together a list of my thoughts and top picks for those planning on picking up a new Mac Pro this holiday season. The good news: There are a few Mac Pro compatible 4K displays (and UHD alternatives) finally starting to hit more reasonable price points just as recent OS X updates fix some issues early adopters first hadВ with the higher resolution displays. 4K might offer 4x the resolution of your standard 1080p display, but for the short time theyвЂ™ve been around, theyвЂ™ve also cost about 4x as much as the alternatives. I found myself in the same predicament not too long ago and decided to put a number of displays to the test in recent months.

So Apple didnвЂ™t release a 4K (or 5K) standalone Retina display alongside the new 5K iMac, but you canвЂ™t hold off any longer on a shiny new display for your Mac Pro. Check out our updated roundup of the best 4K and 5K displays for MacВ for 2016.